Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: what to do?


WATERDOWN, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 548
Date:
what to do?
Permalink  
 


Ok so I got the 52 gmc on a s10 frame runs drives great with a 305 700r4 slushbox but got the blues on start up goes away after warmup,,so heres my issue, first it could be just valve seals ,not sure engine year maybe 87 but its a smog era engine,so headwork,,or,,, I also have a 60,283 that was running when I pulled it out of the coupe also smoking and tired looking at a rebuild mild perfomance, the big plus is no moe issues but cost is a big difference, its a basic engine swap,,just looking for opinions , it wont happen till freeze up, If I go with the 283 I will be looking for a reputable engine builder,,Have ater boys and girls,,Janicewink



__________________

smoke em if you got em!



ONTARIO

Status: Offline
Posts: 227
Date:
Permalink  
 

Those 305's generally have both styles of seals on them. I don't mean they could have one or the other, I literally mean they generally use both styles together ...... the little O-ring up near the retainer and the one that clamps to the valve guide area. Just changing out those seals for new ones might do wonders and can be done with the heads on the engine. Might be worth trying.

You can run the numbers on the block to determine what year the 305 is but I think '87 is when they went to centerbolt valve covers (just mentioning as I have no idea what yours look like).

It's not impossible to add the emission control stuff but if both engines are tired, I think I'd choose the early one to avoid all the MOE issues.



__________________


WATERDOWN, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 548
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ya db its center bolt,,



__________________

smoke em if you got em!



WATERDOWN, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 548
Date:
Permalink  
 

Im leaning towards the 283 just need someone to give a shot in the ribs,lol



__________________

smoke em if you got em!



BRANTFORD, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 2269
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have a 282 for rebuild CHEAP

__________________

"If you don't pass on the knowledge you have to others, it Dies with you"



ONTARIO

Status: Offline
Posts: 4606
Date:
Permalink  
 

Cat in the Hat wrote:

I have a 282 for rebuild CHEAP


 Who makes a 282? Volvo? winkwink



__________________


BRANTFORD, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 2269
Date:
Permalink  
 

Cant fart without the far side of nowhere police

Jumping in

283. 283. 283 283. 283

Dam fat fingers

__________________

"If you don't pass on the knowledge you have to others, it Dies with you"



SOUTH RIVER, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 1771
Date:
Permalink  
 

lmao


__________________

Janice



DUNDAS, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 1962
Date:
Permalink  
 

I know where there is a nice motor done and painted , probably pick it up for under 5 same guy I got the gxer race bike off



__________________
What a long strange trip its been


OSHAWA, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 243
Date:
Permalink  
 

283 would be my choice.

__________________

Tbucket build pics: Build
Tbucket build pics continued: Build
And even more: Build



NORTH BAY, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 3717
Date:
Permalink  
 

Agreed 283 all the way.

__________________


CAMBOURNE, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 271
Date:
Permalink  
 

283

__________________

 

 

The trouble with quotes over the Internet, is that you never know if they are genuine. -- Abraham Lincoln



COBOURG, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 2145
Date:
Permalink  
 

283 has very little torque, you might be dissapointed with it.  who cares about the emmision stuff? just put on what it has to have and be compliant.  even if the equipment is there it doesnt have to work.



__________________


NORTH BAY, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 3717
Date:
Permalink  
 

The emission stuff doesn't have to work????????????????????????????

__________________


NIAGARA FALLS, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 714
Date:
Permalink  
 

sasquatch wrote:

The emission stuff doesn't have to work????????????????????????????


   I was wondering about that to. I was under the impression that if the engine was , say 1985 it had to meet the emission standards for that year.

  As far as the 283 engine, i have to admit i like them . I ran a 283 , fuelie pistons , Duntov solid lifter cam, and dual quads , headers, in early 60s and was turning low to mid 14s at 98 - 100 mph in the quarter mile and drove it on the street . It was a nasty sounding critter and was dependable as well.



__________________


ONTARIO

Status: Offline
Posts: 4606
Date:
Permalink  
 

51 Styline wrote:
sasquatch wrote:

The emission stuff doesn't have to work????????????????????????????


   I was wondering about that to. I was under the impression that if the engine was , say 1985 it had to meet the emission standards for that year.

 


 The components must be there. It doesn't say anywhere in the laws that they must be operational. 



__________________


NIAGARA FALLS, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 714
Date:
Permalink  
 

hemi43 wrote:
51 Styline wrote:
sasquatch wrote:

The emission stuff doesn't have to work????????????????????????????


   I was wondering about that to. I was under the impression that if the engine was , say 1985 it had to meet the emission standards for that year.

 


 The components must be there. It doesn't say anywhere in the laws that they must be operational. 


   But,,,, if they stick a sniffer up your tailpipe it has to meet the standards,, doesn,t it?



__________________


DUNDAS, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 1962
Date:
Permalink  
 

Who,s to say its going to pass with it all hooked up or fail without it. As long as they don't sniff the oil off my pipes from the leaking main seal Id be happy ether way



-- Edited by slim on Wednesday 21st of May 2014 10:48:02 AM

__________________
What a long strange trip its been


BRANTFORD, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 2269
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have 2 ...283's ...1966 1965 and a powerglide...C H E A P !

__________________

"If you don't pass on the knowledge you have to others, it Dies with you"

JPB


AYLMER, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 1620
Date:
Permalink  
 

283, you will like the way it rev's with the 3 inch stroke,let it breathe with 1.94 valve heads,nice cam and intake.You will not be disappointed.

 



__________________

Reality; A test of Mind and Spirit And BODY.               (`-`)               



NIAGARA FALLS, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 714
Date:
Permalink  
 

JPB wrote:

283, you will like the way it rev's with the 3 inch stroke,let it breathe with 1.94 valve heads,nice cam and intake.You will not be disappointed.

 


     X2.  A good running cammed up 283 would be my choice to.



__________________


BADEN, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 1670
Date:
Permalink  
 

Do something different, toss the small block Chevy's and throw a 318 in it.

__________________

Some people just simply don't get it!



BRANTFORD, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 2269
Date:
Permalink  
 

OMG GAZOO

He has a car. Not a boat. He doesn't need an ANCHOR!

__________________

"If you don't pass on the knowledge you have to others, it Dies with you"



ONTARIO

Status: Offline
Posts: 227
Date:
Permalink  
 

It actually does say the emission controls must be functioning.  Below is taken directly from the MOE Ontario website:

Requirements:

Vehicle cannot legally operate if there are visible emissions for more than 15 seconds in any 5-minute period
For Drive Clean testing, the vehicle must meet or exceed what were the emissions standards of the original motor when all original emission control equipment was functioning.
If there weren’t any standards established for the original motor, the vehicle is deemed to be a 1980 model - the standards listed for “1980 and earlier” model-year vehicles apply
All emissions control equipment must be attached and functioning (equipment refers to what came with the replacement motor or be equivalent to what would have come with that motor)



-- Edited by DB Cooper on Wednesday 21st of May 2014 06:01:39 PM

__________________


NIAGARA FALLS, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 714
Date:
Permalink  
 

Cat in the Hat wrote:

OMG GAZOO

He has a car. Not a boat. He doesn't need an ANCHOR!


    Never know,,, he may have a use for a good anchor.



__________________


WATERDOWN, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 548
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ok 283 is the plan, now whos going to help with the rebuild,,,,

__________________

smoke em if you got em!



S/W ONTARIO

Status: Offline
Posts: 639
Date:
Permalink  
 

DB Cooper wrote:

It actually does say the emission controls must be functioning.  Below is taken directly from the MOE Ontario website:

Requirements:

Vehicle cannot legally operate if there are visible emissions for more than 15 seconds in any 5-minute period
For Drive Clean testing, the vehicle must meet or exceed what were the emissions standards of the original motor when all original emission control equipment was functioning.
If there weren’t any standards established for the original motor, the vehicle is deemed to be a 1980 model - the standards listed for “1980 and earlier” model-year vehicles apply
All emissions control equipment must be attached and functioning (equipment refers to what came with the replacement motor or be equivalent to what would have come with that motor)



-- Edited by DB Cooper on Wednesday 21st of May 2014 06:01:39 PM


"" If there weren’t any standards established for the original motor, the vehicle is deemed to be a 1980 model - the standards listed for “1980 and earlier” model-year vehicles apply""

I am having problems with this sentence. Because they don't have records for the year of engine, you have to meet '80's standards.

Maybe I'm not reading it right but it sounds like a loose/loose situation.

Example----If Dodge38 gets stopped with his car the ministry I wouldn't think would have standards for that year so his car with that shiny engine has to meet the emission standards for 1980.

I know life isn't fair but something doesn't smell right with that deal,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

TMJ



__________________

"Good cowgirls keep their calves together"



BADEN, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 1670
Date:
Permalink  
 

Cat in the Hat wrote:

OMG GAZOO

He has a car. Not a boat. He doesn't need an ANCHOR!


 Ya, you're right. He already has two.



__________________

Some people just simply don't get it!



WATERDOWN, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 548
Date:
Permalink  
 

51 Styline wrote:
Cat in the Hat wrote:

OMG GAZOO

He has a car. Not a boat. He doesn't need an ANCHOR!


    Never know,,, he may have a use for a good anchor.


 NO boats or anckors I came so close to trashing a 32 foot twin engine and a million dollar sailboat because nobody told me you steer with the throttles NOT the wheel never again,,,,



__________________

smoke em if you got em!



WATERDOWN, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 548
Date:
Permalink  
 

So the 60 283 should be good in a 52 gmc with no moe issues,,????

__________________

smoke em if you got em!



WATERDOWN, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 548
Date:
Permalink  
 

Gazoo wrote:

Do something different, toss the small block Chevy's and throw a 318 in it.


 I,m a firm beleiver of ford in a ford and chevy in a chevy ,,except a hemi in anything,,



__________________

smoke em if you got em!



ONTARIO

Status: Offline
Posts: 4606
Date:
Permalink  
 

31 Blackrat wrote:

So the 60 283 should be good in a 52 gmc with no moe issues,,????


 Yes !!



__________________


DUNDAS, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 1962
Date:
Permalink  
 

Curly and larry might have something to say though. 



__________________
What a long strange trip its been


BRANTFORD, ONT

Status: Offline
Posts: 2269
Date:
Permalink  
 

Oooooohhhh a wise guy eh? RRRRuffff RRRRRuffffff RRRRRRuffffff

__________________

"If you don't pass on the knowledge you have to others, it Dies with you"

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard