I'm not putting down his build or commenting anything personal. I'm just wondering if you can build a car from scratch and legally put it on the road without any scrutiny. And what company would ever insure it?
Aren't there laws requireing crash testing and all the modern crash avoidance items that you see when building a car.
It seems like the only way would be to lie about what it is. Even a safety standards certificate requires that the car have everything it had from the factory. At least that is my understanding. So I'm just wondering how the logistics of this will work. No foul intentions here.
Looks great to me.. I could saftey that tomorrow for yah Glen...A good coat of clear and a couple sardine cans on the visor and your good to go..Always some turds that are jealous of how a expert Kustom enginered street rod is fabricated ..I am sure glad that unlike some other at least it is not in my face every post you make ..I am gratefull that you have class as well fabricating skills..
I'm not putting down his build or commenting anything personal. I'm just wondering if you can build a car from scratch and legally put it on the road without any scrutiny. And what company would ever insure it?
Aren't there laws requireing crash testing and all the modern crash avoidance items that you see when building a car.
It seems like the only way would be to lie about what it is. Even a safety standards certificate requires that the car have everything it had from the factory. At least that is my understanding. So I'm just wondering how the logistics of this will work. No foul intentions here.
quebec has strict frame standards, no modifications allowed. we don't have any rules concerning frames in Ontario that im aware of, the safety aspect of it is up to the garage or drunk who safeties your ride. as some frames are not built using proper methods its up to the mechanic to determine what is good or not. when I certified my rat truck, the mechanic told me the frame had to be either arc or tig welded, he would not accept a mig-ed frame. his opinion was, if I sold it and something happened and it was determined the frame of my truck was not suitable, he would be liable and so would I. as I am a relatively experienced welder, I was able to build the frame to my mechanics standards. what ever your mechanic tells you is what you need to do as they are the one who is ultimately responsible after it is ceritified.
It seems like the only way would be to lie about what it is. Even a safety standards certificate requires that the car have everything it had from the factory. At least that is my understanding. So I'm just wondering how the logistics of this will work. No foul intentions here.
You mean things like 6 volt lighting? Wood spoke wheels? Skinny bias ply tires? Mechanical drum brakes? Solid steering shafts? Plate glass windows?
If this were the case, there would be no hot rods and no Rodder forum. It would be sad.
the car doesn't have to have everything it had literally, just what is required for a safety appropriate for its era. I have a list somewhere for what is required at the least for a vehicle to pass a cert, you would be amazed at what is not required.
You mean things like 6 volt lighting? Wood spoke wheels? Skinny bias ply tires? Mechanical drum brakes? Solid steering shafts? Plate glass windows?
If this were the case, there would be no hot rods and no Rodder forum. It would be sad.
No that's not what I mean. Obviously it would have to have lighting, wheels, tires and brakes.
I mean......can anyone scratch build a car and legally put it on the road without complying with current regulations? And who would insure it?
I think in Ontario it matters how it's titled. Original title or kit car. Someone who builds one offs would better answer that question. All I know is if you take it to get certified as long admit passes the check list then it's fine.
I mean......can anyone scratch build a car and legally put it on the road without complying with current regulations? And who would insure it?
Yes they can, and it's done everyday. The grey area is what is the "current regulation"?? Using a VIN from an original car is one of the reasons it's preferred over a car labeled as a "kit car". As long as the vehicle passes a certification , then it's deemed road worthy. As far as insuring, there's many companies out there that specialize in these cars, like Lant, Hagerty and Vintage. Trying to insure a homebuilt car through normal car insurance usually wont work if the car is at all modified. I have never heard of a mechanic refusing a certificate because the car's frame was MIG welded, but that's totally up to him, because it's his license that's on the line.
As a 28/29 Ford it will meet and/or surpass any safety inspection Glen submits it to. Great look. Most 2 door sedan conversions look 'awkward' This looks like a hot rod.
Sure is a lot of us just on this site with home built street -rods that are licensed and insured, not sure about others but this is about my 10th one and I built about 10 others over the last 30 years ..no idea where they are to-day or they are even on the road, but they all got saftied, licensed and insured at some time with-out Transport Canada or the Ontario Motor Vehicle department being concerned if the wheel would even stayed on as long as they were certified by a certfied auto motive mechanic....Their main concern is Emissions emissions, emissions...What scares me more, is how many trailers get built "licensed"with-out anybody even looking at them and they haul some pretty heavy stuff on our roads..Unsafe cars should not be on the road for sure and as a mechanic I would not saftey a car that did not meet basic items..but some good common sense is what is required ..we have a book of guidelines but it has a lot of words that say .. "might or may" and most of the DOT persons that are supposed to have the answers when you call with a request for a disscussion for some clarification on a "might or may" they are unwilling, unable, to give you a clear answer..So after 50 years in this I have learned to apply common sense to the "might or may" I have never had one issue in fifty years... and thousands of saftey certificates.. IF IT HAS TITS AND TIRES and Holy-Chit bar for Gazoo should pass just fine...
-- Edited by poncho62 on Sunday 16th of March 2014 09:14:17 PM
I have no idea when a certified mechanic, became certified to determine whether a weld was good or not. Best of my knowledge, is if there is no holes in the frame/uni-body, floor etc...it should pass safety certification. There's many certified mechanics out there, that wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a Mig/Tig/stick or even gas weld. Like Hemi said, there is a grey area there between a kit Car and using a VIN.
Using a VIN from an original car is one of the reasons it's preferred over a car labeled as a "kit car".
That's what I mean. You basically have to lie. Doesn't the VIN usually follow the frame? The only thing on Glen's car that is from the original car is a part of the cab. Or is that a gray area also. Could you use the VIN from a car that you only used the headlights from?
If it registered as a 28 then it would need brakes and lights and tire's that hold air . I think the upgrades will far surpass whats required. I also think any custom work should be banned in Quebec and save the rest of us from the suffering of having to look at whatever it is they think is custom.
Using a VIN from an original car is one of the reasons it's preferred over a car labeled as a "kit car".
That's what I mean. You basically have to lie. Doesn't the VIN usually follow the frame? The only thing on Glen's car that is from the original car is a part of the cab. Or is that a gray area also. Could you use the VIN from a car that you only used the headlights from?
I was also told by my mechanic that if you use a body with an affixed vin you have to use that as the registration for the vehicle, so you cant call it a kit car in the sense of you are using a ford or dodge or chevy cab or body.
To register a kit car it has to be manufactured by a company . this is not a kit . to register it as homemade . you have to make the entire body and frame I think Nick (invision) is the only one here that comes close to this . that leaves the original make as the closest and most accurate description of the car .
Using a VIN from an original car is one of the reasons it's preferred over a car labeled as a "kit car".
That's what I mean. You basically have to lie. Doesn't the VIN usually follow the frame? The only thing on Glen's car that is from the original car is a part of the cab. Or is that a gray area also. Could you use the VIN from a car that you only used the headlights from?
I was also told by my mechanic that if you use a body with an affixed vin you have to use that as the registration for the vehicle, so you cant call it a kit car in the sense of you are using a ford or dodge or chevy cab or body.
So where does a Pro-Street car fall, with a full tube frame?
Using a VIN from an original car is one of the reasons it's preferred over a car labeled as a "kit car".
That's what I mean. You basically have to lie. Doesn't the VIN usually follow the frame? The only thing on Glen's car that is from the original car is a part of the cab. Or is that a gray area also. Could you use the VIN from a car that you only used the headlights from?
I was also told by my mechanic that if you use a body with an affixed vin you have to use that as the registration for the vehicle, so you cant call it a kit car in the sense of you are using a ford or dodge or chevy cab or body.
So where does a Pro-Street car fall, with a full tube frame?
We are railroading Glenn's build thread. Maybe start another thread.
actually funny you mention it, I know a guy who has a pretty much full dragster he drives around, or used to which is a 63 corvette as registered but has stickers for head lights and could do an 8 second quarter. I think he got pinched eventually due to the lack of the road worthy-ness of his dragster.
I wouldn't trust the work of some "certified" body shops. Even though the guys might have an auto body license, personal habits like alcohol and drugs get in the way. I have seen too many substandard patch jobs from certified bodymen over the years. I know it is safe when I build it. Stay the course Glenn, It will be 1000 times safer than the original Model A will ever be. How many people want the gas tank in their lap?
here is something i learned, back in febuary this yr for insurance renewal. i asked the question of what makes a car rodded just to see if maybe there was a saving somewhere. we went over each one separately.
"Most of our cars fall into the "hot rod" category, because it is a modified vehicle from an original manufacturer."
-
a brief example of what i got out of it,
my 69 coronet original 318ci has a hemi now and would not be considered rodded do to that engine was available and offered to the car in 69. i do pay the extra for rodded because of the headers and a couple of other things. if it was a stock set up no extra. i just found it interesting with the upgrade on the motor is allowed if it was available to that model in that year. the 5spd tranny and moser dana would be ok if the motor was the stock set up. you pay extra because of the value going up but not for power up.
-so, say a 64 biscayne 6cyl upped to a stock 409 set up, not rodded as it was offered to that model in that year.
this is the way i took it anyway. you should check if in doubt though.
As far as I see, there is no VIN for Glen's build. I assume he is going to use the VIN from the car that the cab came off. In reality, the build has nothing to do with the original car, other than using a partial cab from it. Maybe the rear end came off it too, I don't know. I understand that this is what is done all the time. So my questions are:
1. Could you use a headlight off a car and then use that car's VIN for a scratch built car? It sounds like the answer would be yes because who would question it as long as you sign some kind of affidavit at the MTO office.
2: If you told the MTO and your insurance company that you built the car from scratch and you're using the VIN from a car that has little to do with your build, would they say OK, you're good to go?
3. Does this mean that any Joe can build a car and put it on the road as long as he can find a VIN and some drunk to certify it and basically lie about it's origin?
It seems like this is the way things are. Again, I am NOT commenting on Glen's build at all. Just using it as an example. He is obviously an experienced builder who's car will be safe on the road. But how many builders are there out there that aren't experienced but can do the same? Are there others who find this to be scary?
I would think that the vehicle for the most part has to resemble what you are calling it, for example you cant put a vin tag on a 90's s 10 cab from a 40's truck and call it a 40's truck. its would obviously still be a s 10. a head light is not enough of a car to identify it as what its suppose to be, theres no vin tag on a headlamp. you would not be lying about the truck since the cab is still from the truck in question and you have simply changed or modified the frame and other parts. now calling that project of glens a truck when it was a car originally I don't know what happens there since it was a car but is now a truck, it will be a passenger vehicle and have to have blue plate but since all trucks are considered commercial, as long as they have a box or cube or deck and have only two seats, he will have to have black plates. so if he registers it as the car that it was, he will get blue plates, if he drives it with those plates he will get pinched so that's another story.
My frame is riveted on my 34 chev truck and my 27 ford and my 33 3 window and my 34 5 window
How ever will I get a safety for any of these cars??
riveting is fine as tons of trucks are still built that way, it was a factory made frame that passed whatever standards it had to pass. welding a frame up is easier then bolting one together I would think
1 - If you built the car fabricating all the parts of the body and the frame it would be considered home built and the Dot would issue you a vin starting with .....HOM and then first letter of the month you where born. No one that is born in October should do this.
2 - The term VIN never existed till 1988 in the eyes of the law so we are talking about Serial numbers. None the less if the number was originally affixed to the vehicle that is the number they will use. Last i checked swapping body tags was a federal offence meaning Criminal record and possible time in jail and forfeit of the vehicle to the crown .There a lots of Opinions on this but if you need to buy a clue something that is considered Illegal should not be discussed on a public form .If you have documentation on where the components came from but a body with no number they will issue a new vin with the body make . you will need to meet the emission standard s for the year of the motor as long as it isn't OB2 compliant you will need to pass a 2 speed idle test for drive clean.
3 - The correct answer would be Yes. If you take this route you roll the dice and take your chances It may or may not ever come back to Bite you. Something like posting a picture of yourself naked on the net no matter how much time passes its out there and can be linked back to you if someone cares to look.
My frame is riveted on my 34 chev truck and my 27 ford and my 33 3 window and my 34 5 window
How ever will I get a safety for any of these cars??
riveting is fine as tons of trucks are still built that way, it was a factory made frame that passed whatever standards it had to pass. welding a frame up is easier then bolting one together I would think
Anyone that has ever removed a rivet will tell you that even when you grind off the head you will need to knock the remaining part out using some force because it expands and fills the area in the hole. simple inserting a bolt would let the parts float.If you had to bolt it the only thing that would come close would be to clamp the pieces together and run a tap through them. not as effective but close.
These type of threads can cause a lot of problems. I can almost guarantee this site is monitored and COULD create new rules and laws that make it even harder to get a hot rod registered or insured in Ontario. The way some of these questions and comments are worded should be a concern. Or maybe I'm just paranoid.
These type of threads can cause a lot of problems. I can almost guarantee this site is monitored and COULD create new rules and laws that make it even harder to get a hot rod registered or insured in Ontario. The way some of these questions and comments are worded should be a concern. Or maybe I'm just paranoid.
Its not like this is some guarded secret. Its been common Knowledge for years don't kid yourself .We can change the way we do things our self or we can wait for someone to ram change down our throats . No matter . Change is coming and no one can stop it . cover your ass now not latter .
These type of threads can cause a lot of problems. I can almost guarantee this site is monitored and COULD create new rules and laws that make it even harder to get a hot rod registered or insured in Ontario. The way some of these questions and comments are worded should be a concern. Or maybe I'm just paranoid.
Yeah, you're paranoid !! I really hope that this site is monitored, because it shows that most of us are concerned about registering our rides properly and making them emission compliant. As far as someone registering their pieced together car with whatever VIN number, I don't think is a bit issue because we're dealing with cars that are 60+ years old. Legal or not, the Government is not stupid and they know what goes on in the car hobby, and their main concern is VIN swaps with newer vehicles that are stolen.
As far as Grump's car using the original serial number for the body, he's not going to have any problems even if he has turned it into a truck. They're not going to waste their time pursuing crap like this even if the law states he shouldn't do it. This is no different than emission BS we've been talking about for 2+ years. We know you can't run an emission engine in an older vehicle, but there's thousands of Guys out there that do. Not once have we heard of these Guys getting busted, unless the Guy got mouthy with the officer.
My tin hat [triple thickness] is securely fastened. L.O.L. I recognize there aren't many secrets to get a car registered but by rubbing their nose in it ,loopholes get closed and laws get changed. I.E. Quebecs B.S. law regarding frame modifications. That wouldn't be to popular in Ontario. Don't forget how we used to be able to put a car in our name without the 1 page appraisal. I know that got changed because of internet chatter. Anyho I hear a drone over the shop. Over and out.
My tin hat [triple thickness] is securely fastened. L.O.L. I recognize there aren't many secrets to get a car registered but by rubbing their nose in it ,loopholes get closed and laws get changed. I.E. Quebecs B.S. law regarding frame modifications. That wouldn't be to popular in Ontario. Don't forget how we used to be able to put a car in our name without the 1 page appraisal. I know that got changed because of internet chatter. Anyho I hear a drone over the shop. Over and out.
remember to not use the alcan glide foil, the one side is not reflective, i dont want to even think of what could happen.
The early 50's Cadillacs used the serial number stamped on the block ... at least in the case of my '54 ... and probably fairly common on the 50's GM cars ...
My experience in the past with a '51 Thames panel that had the firewall cut out and no serial number.
I tried to get a number from the DOT, but ended up with a one hour conversation with a guy in their Kingston office. He informed me that the panel did not have a number so my only option was to scrap it. It's no longer a vehicle. He also told me that if you make any modifications from the factory (his example was putting a Camaro fender on a Mustang), you have changed the car from how it came out of the factory and your ownership in now null and void.
If this is the opinion of the DOT then I suggest we all scrap our cars.
I was so frustrated after talking to this guy, I sold the body hoping someone else would have better luck. Would you scrap a good '51 Thames body because it had no serial number?
It's important that we all must realize how important it is to not give big brother any excuses to end our hobby. Believe me, they will use any loophole to pass legislation to stop hot rodding in any form.
And it's only become more fuzzy with the privatization of the Service Ontario kiosks. It seems each one has their own idea on what is the correct procedure. If there is a rule book, it seems not too many refer to it.
For a random example, both my Rancheros have blue car plates on them - it is vaguely a truck, but based on a car platform with no frame(uni-body). I've had people from all over Ontario ask me how I got the car plates and bitched about how they were stuck with black truck plates.
Your guess is as good as mine. It seems if you've hit a road block the answer might be as simple as taking it to the kiosk in the next town. Your issue might not be an issue there!
__________________
"If I could get back all the money I've ever spent on cars...I'd spend it ALL on cars !!!
And it's only become more fuzzy with the privatization of the Service Ontario kiosks. It seems each one has their own idea on what is the correct procedure. If there is a rule book, it seems not too many refer to it.
For a random example, both my Rancheros have blue car plates on them - it is vaguely a truck, but based on a car platform with no frame(uni-body). I've had people from all over Ontario ask me how I got the car plates and bitched about how they were stuck with black truck plates.
Your guess is as good as mine. It seems if you've hit a road block the answer might be as simple as taking it to the kiosk in the next town. Your issue might not be an issue there!
that is odd cause any el camino ive ever seen has had the black plates, I haven't seen any rancheros on the road that I can recall but im sure I have.
And it's only become more fuzzy with the privatization of the Service Ontario kiosks. It seems each one has their own idea on what is the correct procedure. If there is a rule book, it seems not too many refer to it.
For a random example, both my Rancheros have blue car plates on them - it is vaguely a truck, but based on a car platform with no frame(uni-body). I've had people from all over Ontario ask me how I got the car plates and bitched about how they were stuck with black truck plates.
Your guess is as good as mine. It seems if you've hit a road block the answer might be as simple as taking it to the kiosk in the next town. Your issue might not be an issue there!
Mine has BLACK truck plates on it and the sticker on the front
See what I mean? Wishy washy, no set single answer - although the El Camino and Ranchero are a grey area, they should all be the same either way. I think that they should use the car plates based on the fact that they are made on a car platform. Also, they all have a pathetic payload capacity. Others will argue the other way - it has a bed, therefore it's a truck.
My full sized Bronco was another grey area. When I had my 1992, it had passenger car plates, but when I replaced the '92 with a '95 they wanted me to use commercial plates. So inconsistent! Same vehicle!
__________________
"If I could get back all the money I've ever spent on cars...I'd spend it ALL on cars !!!
My 1960 Ranchero from Flint, Texas had ''Truck '' embossed on the plate. I believe Dent has it hanging in his garage. Regarding registering a vehicle, hopefully VIN checks don't happen soon as they are just starting to occur in many states and causing havoc with SEMA and individual state laws. Register your vehicle now with an assigned VIN before they bury us in paperwork. Good luck with your build and let's enjoy our rides as we may be the last generation to do so. Boots
talkin about serial numbers on different parts of the vehicle got me thinking about a 67 BSA chopper i had build. I had wanted to build a chopper and was nervous with regulation and such about trying to register the bike with a proper registration. I didn't want a registration like i had on a 1973 z1 kawasaki that i assembled from wrecking yard parts but was registered as a 1985 rebuild. it was interesting in that the frame was a factory replacement frame and didn't have a serial number stamped in it. now i lucked in because i had acquired 67 bsa rolling chassis with engine and they at that time used the engine as the serial number. not sure what year they changed probably early 70's but the bike was registered. i got a santee chopper frame from california with bill of sales but no serial, sold the rolling chassis with bill of sales and wah-lah legal 67 bsa chopper.
__________________
There are 106 miles to Chicago. We have a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses.
Still have my 1967 BSA Lightning chopper and the frame and cases have matching numbers. Took it apart when I got divorced in 1984 and there she sits. Maybe this year, as age passing me by and I probably only have a few kickstarts left in me. It is only going to get tougher as they mandate new laws and insurance restrictions on us. As I said before, let's enjoy the freedom we have now. Register that baby and drive it as much as you can........Boots
It seems that most of you are not understanding the difference between SOLID and SAFE, so here's a few examples,
,
And this one,
,
Now having said this...you can look far and low, to find actual Ontario requirements, as to how low and how strong a frame can be.
For those of you with an engineering degree, the Tensile strength of Gr. A steel tubing is 45,000 lbs, Gr.B is 58,000lbs. Tensile strength is the braking point of pressure.
The Yield strength is 33,000 lbs for Gr.A, and 42,000 lbs for Gr.B. Yield strength is were the material starts to deform.
OK, so now I move on to the frame height and impact zone (this is what you're all concerned about, isn't it?).
Well...I'm not going there (sorry to disappoint), but it would take me over 40hrs (and then some), to draw this all up in Catia, and let it generate the simulation for me.
Those videos have always impressed me, but where newer cars fall way short is in the ultra low speed fender bender and very high speed stuff. It's a trade off.
Old days at 5mph: chain the bumper to the tree and bang out or swap the fender and you're down the road sometimes for $0.00 - I've done it a few times in my younger day!
Nowadays at 5 mph: $1000s of dollars and often if the airbag goes off, it's a write off. Case in point: a teacher at a school I was working at had her Honda Civic backed into in the parking lot by another teacher. Nowhere near 5MPH, but just over $1400.00 in damage to 1/4, tail light, rear fascia and paint. Bad day for the other teacher. Both teachers I guess. I think the newest cars have a system in place to prevent the airbag from going off at lower speeds, potentially allowing the car to be fixed.
It seems that they're engineered to a particular speed range these days, beyond 80 to 100 kmh you're pretty much toast anyway. I'd take a fabricated tube chassis over crumple zones for higher speeds anyday. There is a reason they're used in NHRA and NASCAR rules - it doesn't ALWAYS prevent death but it's got to be safer at elevated speeds.
Bottom line: I guess the crumple zones are a good trade off for the masses, but it's a shame when a minor Deer hit becomes a write off and contributes greatly to our "Throw away society".
__________________
"If I could get back all the money I've ever spent on cars...I'd spend it ALL on cars !!!
Those videos have always impressed me, but where newer cars fall way short is in the ultra low speed fender bender and very high speed stuff. It's a trade off.
Old days at 5mph: chain the bumper to the tree and bang out or swap the fender and you're down the road sometimes for $0.00 - I've done it a few times in my younger day!
Nowadays at 5 mph: $1000s of dollars and often if the airbag goes off, it's a write off. Case in point: a teacher at a school I was working at had her Honda Civic backed into in the parking lot by another teacher. Nowhere near 5MPH, but just over $1400.00 in damage to 1/4, tail light, rear fascia and paint. Bad day for the other teacher. Both teachers I guess. I think the newest cars have a system in place to prevent the airbag from going off at lower speeds, potentially allowing the car to be fixed.
It seems that they're engineered to a particular speed range these days, beyond 80 to 100 kmh you're pretty much toast anyway. I'd take a fabricated tube chassis over crumple zones for higher speeds anyday. There is a reason they're used in NHRA and NASCAR rules - it doesn't ALWAYS prevent death but it's got to be safer at elevated speeds.
Bottom line: I guess the crumple zones are a good trade off for the masses, but it's a shame when a minor Deer hit becomes a write off and contributes greatly to our "Throw away society".
Fordy, You're already screwed at a 50 mph collision! What makes you even think you'd be better off at a higher speed?
And what front end collision damage of any car could you replace (not doing the work yourself), for under $1,500. not including paint and labor.
The main question in this topic, has yet still to be answered... And I believe it's a safety concern.
I'm not concerned personally, 'cuz I'm building one, and I can't wait to drive it. But then again, I won't commute with it. So I'm really not all that concerned about my odds.
For arguments sakes...I would've been impressed with a car from the '60's/'70's or even '80's to run 300 k's, today it's really not that unusual. The bodies in the '60's/'70's/'80's,... you'd be lucky to get 7-8 years before rust through.
Just Sayin', depends where your priorities are, or what you are willing to over-look.
I personally have no issues, I'll build/ride them, and I love it, but for those who'd like to know, well... it's up to them to make an informed decision.
Let's reverse engineer this puppy. How many cars built today will still be around in 80 -85 years like the Model A is now and how many of those will be made better with upgraded frames, suspension, brakes and -power plants- /drivetrains -Hotrodded? Too much plastic on these new cars that actually breakdown over time. They are using more and more plastic and foam to attempt to keep up with increasing crash standards and they do work when new, obviously. What happens in 20 or 30 years when all that plastics becomes brittle and the foam breaks down, even if you meticulously maintain the car, that plastic is compromised by age alone. Older cars are compromised by rust, but that's about it. The newer cars use this plastic, foam, crumple zones and airbags working together as a system. If one or more of the pieces of that puzzle fail.....????
I do agree about the increased mileage before the car is thrown away though. Technology has come so far that production tolerances and materials are so much better. BUT! You could rebuild way more stuff on older cars and not have to throw it away like today.
We could debate this stuff for hours and hours, but I'd like to sum it up like this:
New cars suck! ....but they're awesome!
Old cars are awesome....but they suck!
__________________
"If I could get back all the money I've ever spent on cars...I'd spend it ALL on cars !!!
I see it this way. When I go to Armdrop drags just about every new vehicle there ,cars and trucks can probably get down the strip faster than me. Hell my daughters mini van is probably faster. My shop van is probably more comfortable,Radio,a/c,cupholders etc and probably safer,belts,air bags,crumple zones and stuff I don't even know about. But none of them can do what my 55 can. When I look out over those round fenders and hood thru that wraparound windshield and listen to the rumble of the motor nothing at that moment can whipe the smile off my face. Its a zone you get into weather you are racing or cruising that gets you away from the everyday and into another place and time. I suppose in reality newer cars are are better in so many ways but my old clunker is better in the only way that really counts, smiles per mile. Ed